Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
but mistaken assumptions, the person subjected to a search or seizure has not necessarily been the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44070 - 2014-09-15
but mistaken assumptions, the person subjected to a search or seizure has not necessarily been the victim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44070 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to a search or seizure has not necessarily been the victim of a constitutional violation.” Herring, 129 S.Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
to a search or seizure has not necessarily been the victim of a constitutional violation.” Herring, 129 S.Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44070 - 2009-11-30
[MS WORD]
IW-1711: Order for Temporary Physical Custody (Secure/Nonsecure) - Indian Child Welfare Act
Child Welfare Act Case No. A hearing for temporary physical custody was held on [Date
/formdisplay/IW-1711.doc?formNumber=IW-1711&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-08-14
Child Welfare Act Case No. A hearing for temporary physical custody was held on [Date
/formdisplay/IW-1711.doc?formNumber=IW-1711&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257490 - 2020-04-15
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257490 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616428 - 2023-01-31
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616428 - 2023-01-31
State v. Wylie McDonald, Jr.
in and search the house because we had information which led us to believe that the shooter may be inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
in and search the house because we had information which led us to believe that the shooter may be inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11733 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Randy R. Mertz
on the claims raised in this court and it was necessary for this court to search the separate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
on the claims raised in this court and it was necessary for this court to search the separate record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8617 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Strean
v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 16 (1968). When the pertinent facts are undisputed, as they are in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15189 - 2017-09-21
v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 16 (1968). When the pertinent facts are undisputed, as they are in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15189 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randy R. Mertz
of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
of constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Whether the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8617 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell L. Strean
are undisputed, as they are in this case, we review the constitutionality of searches and seizures de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15189 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed, as they are in this case, we review the constitutionality of searches and seizures de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15189 - 2005-03-31