Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. Hicks claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27238 - 2006-11-27
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] postconviction motion. Hicks claims the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27238 - 2006-11-27
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas J. Becker
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10494 - 2005-03-31
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Peter Bekersky
a guilty plea. Bekersky contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
a guilty plea. Bekersky contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7779 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gregory Badalich
of operating an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15615 - 2005-03-31
of operating an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15615 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth Aronson v. Kimberly Ann Hjemvick
(hereafter collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15263 - 2005-03-31
(hereafter collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15263 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
his motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elizabeth Aronson v. Kimberly Ann Hjemvick
collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15263 - 2017-09-21
collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15263 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction. Knapp argues that the trial court misused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
conviction. Knapp argues that the trial court misused its discretion in denying his motion for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49214 - 2010-04-21
State v. Thomas J. Becker
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31