Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 58542 for speedy trial.
Search results 11911 - 11920 of 58542 for speedy trial.
State v. William J. Foley
, 1992. See § 940.20(3), Stats. On the day of trial, after the trial court refused to permit him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
, 1992. See § 940.20(3), Stats. On the day of trial, after the trial court refused to permit him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15754 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
his motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
his motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregory Badalich
of operating an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15615 - 2005-03-31
of operating an automobile while under the influence of an intoxicant, as a third offense, and from the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15615 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. Becker
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
traffic offenses, the trial court sentenced Becker to concurrent sentences, the maximum of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10493 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey Barnekow
motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
motion for a new trial on three counts of substantial battery. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13453 - 2017-09-21
State v. Peter Bekersky
. The conviction resulted from a guilty plea. Bekersky contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31
. The conviction resulted from a guilty plea. Bekersky contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7779 - 2005-03-31
Charles Britton v. Bonny Britton
for violating a visitation order. Bonny argues that the trial court should not have imputed income to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4517 - 2005-03-31
for violating a visitation order. Bonny argues that the trial court should not have imputed income to her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4517 - 2005-03-31
Elizabeth Aronson v. Kimberly Ann Hjemvick
(hereafter collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15263 - 2005-03-31
(hereafter collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15263 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Mikel
of conviction. The no merit report addresses only whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. The no merit report addresses only whether the trial court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elizabeth Aronson v. Kimberly Ann Hjemvick
collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15263 - 2017-09-21
collectively “MSI”) appeal a trial court order that denied MSI’s motion to reopen a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15263 - 2017-09-21