Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 30176 for consulta de causas.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
¶6 Our review of a circuit court’s decision on summary judgment is de novo. Behrendt v. Gulf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185905 - 2017-09-21

Richard G. Scullion and Teresa Scullion v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company
. However, we review, de novo, whether those instructions correctly stated the law that is applicable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14768 - 2005-03-31

State v. Peter C. Ramuta
We review de novo whether something is a new factor. Id., 148 Wis. 2d at 8, 434 N.W.2d at 611. “[W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
or denial of a summary judgment, we apply the same methodology as the trial court and review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36385 - 2009-05-04

2010 WI APP 39
standard and the latter de novo. See id. Discussion ¶12 Williams argues that the loaded gun should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45283 - 2010-03-30

WI App 52 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1275-CR Complete Title...
. Jacobs, 2012 WI App 104, ¶17, 344 Wis. 2d 142, 154–155, 822 N.W.2d 885, 890–891. We decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94202 - 2013-04-23

2006 WI APP 231
a question of law, which we review de novo. Ferdon v. Wisconsin Patients Comp. Fund, 2005 WI 125, ¶58, 284
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26678 - 2006-11-20

State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5556 - 2012-12-11

State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5559 - 2012-12-11

Town of Avon v. Edgar Oliver
range. The interpretation of these statutes presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4165 - 2005-03-31