Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 58553 for o j.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 58553 for o j.
CA Blank Order
in terminating Wyverna’s parental rights at the dispositional hearing. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92254 - 2013-02-05
in terminating Wyverna’s parental rights at the dispositional hearing. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92254 - 2013-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
of the crimes. ¶19 In short, the court considered only proper objectives and factors. “[S]o long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43245 - 2009-11-09
of the crimes. ¶19 In short, the court considered only proper objectives and factors. “[S]o long
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43245 - 2009-11-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
injustice.” State v. Taylor, 2013 WI 34, ¶48, 347 Wis. 2d 30, 829 N.W.2d 482. “[O]ne way for a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803511 - 2024-05-22
injustice.” State v. Taylor, 2013 WI 34, ¶48, 347 Wis. 2d 30, 829 N.W.2d 482. “[O]ne way for a defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=803511 - 2024-05-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. Coleman v. McCaughtry, 2006 WI 49, ¶29, 290 Wis. 2d 352, 714 N.W.2d 900. “‘[O]nly when ignored issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30666 - 2007-10-22
. Coleman v. McCaughtry, 2006 WI 49, ¶29, 290 Wis. 2d 352, 714 N.W.2d 900. “‘[O]nly when ignored issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30666 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2015, we recounted that appeal No. 2015AP1715 had been dismissed. We added that “[t]o the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190768 - 2017-09-21
, 2015, we recounted that appeal No. 2015AP1715 had been dismissed. We added that “[t]o the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190768 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
concludes that “[t]o the extent that the court imposed a sentence in this case based upon the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
concludes that “[t]o the extent that the court imposed a sentence in this case based upon the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93052 - 2013-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Samuel Jones
, article I, § 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution provides: “[N]o person for the same offense may be put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2896 - 2017-09-19
, article I, § 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution provides: “[N]o person for the same offense may be put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2896 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for his conduct, but summarized Veloz’s position by explaining, “[s]o whether Mr. Veloz actually heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
for his conduct, but summarized Veloz’s position by explaining, “[s]o whether Mr. Veloz actually heard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51410 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
from three proposed witnesses. One averred that “[n]o gun was found.” Another averred that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
from three proposed witnesses. One averred that “[n]o gun was found.” Another averred that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43579 - 2009-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
, but summarized Veloz’s position by explaining, “[s]o whether Mr. Veloz actually heard what the police said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28
, but summarized Veloz’s position by explaining, “[s]o whether Mr. Veloz actually heard what the police said
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51410 - 2010-06-28