Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 64042 for records/1000.
Search results 11921 - 11930 of 64042 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
be able to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
be able to identify facts outside the record that might affect the validity of his pleas and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119821 - 2014-08-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=785771 - 2024-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there is no issue of arguable
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238652 - 2019-04-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that would have allowed for a motion to suppress Higgenbottom’s cell phone records. ¶6 One year later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
that would have allowed for a motion to suppress Higgenbottom’s cell phone records. ¶6 One year later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367402 - 2021-05-19
State v. Robert J. Ferguson
improperly changed his sentence from concurrent to consecutive, three years after the fact. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12009 - 2005-03-31
improperly changed his sentence from concurrent to consecutive, three years after the fact. The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12009 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Flores could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136511 - 2015-03-01
review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues of arguable merit that Flores could raise
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=136511 - 2015-03-01
CA Blank Order
and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133307 - 2015-01-20
and subsequent motion for reconsideration. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133307 - 2015-01-20
State v. Anthony M. Harris
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
The record does not support Harris’ claim that the trial court conducted an inadequate plea colloquy. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7099 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
recommendation on the record before accepting Phillips’s plea; and (4) failing to advise Phillips that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35190 - 2009-01-14
recommendation on the record before accepting Phillips’s plea; and (4) failing to advise Phillips that the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35190 - 2009-01-14