Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11931 - 11940 of 34922 for in n.
Search results 11931 - 11940 of 34922 for in n.
COURT OF APPEALS
forfeited the right to counsel.[2] Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d at 756 n.18. ¶13 However, even in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
forfeited the right to counsel.[2] Cummings, 199 Wis. 2d at 756 n.18. ¶13 However, even in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41864 - 2009-10-05
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 20, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
exercised its discretion. See State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28484 - 2007-03-19
exercised its discretion. See State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1, 493 N.W.2d 367 (1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28484 - 2007-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for any reason. Correa v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 2010 WI App 171, ¶4, 330 Wis. 2d 682, 794 N.W.2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
for any reason. Correa v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 2010 WI App 171, ¶4, 330 Wis. 2d 682, 794 N.W.2d 259
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
State v. Renee L. Reek
-for-day credit: “[a]n offender is entitled to have his or her total sentence credited with one day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
-for-day credit: “[a]n offender is entitled to have his or her total sentence credited with one day
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2541 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
is on the beneficiary of the error to establish that the error was not prejudicial. Dyess, at 547 n.11, 370 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11108 - 2005-03-31
is on the beneficiary of the error to establish that the error was not prejudicial. Dyess, at 547 n.11, 370 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11108 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
additional charges were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
additional charges were dismissed as read-ins at sentencing. Nos. 2013AP2430-CR 2013AP2431-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WI 12, ¶51 n.15, 390 Wis. 2d 172, 938 N.W.2d 530 (“The failure to raise a meritless objection does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099323 - 2026-04-02
WI 12, ¶51 n.15, 390 Wis. 2d 172, 938 N.W.2d 530 (“The failure to raise a meritless objection does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1099323 - 2026-04-02
[PDF]
State v. D. Weasler
/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis.2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 n.1 (Ct. App. 1981) (issues not briefed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14936 - 2017-09-21
/A Adver., Inc., 102 Wis.2d 305, 306 n.1, 306 N.W.2d 292, 294 n.1 (Ct. App. 1981) (issues not briefed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14936 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
party or by the county. Id., ¶11 n.6. In the present case, Seiler was required to pay his share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101818 - 2017-09-21
party or by the county. Id., ¶11 n.6. In the present case, Seiler was required to pay his share
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101818 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
or not the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. See State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28484 - 2014-09-15
or not the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion. See State v. Plymesser, 172 Wis. 2d 583, 585-86 n.1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28484 - 2014-09-15