Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11941 - 11950 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 11941 - 11950 of 24568 for extending.
Manitowoc County v. Denise G.
that this court has no authority to extend the time to file a notice of intent to appeal in a TPR.[2] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9937 - 2005-03-31
that this court has no authority to extend the time to file a notice of intent to appeal in a TPR.[2] See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9937 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
, bifurcated as five years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision. The court stayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31049 - 2007-12-03
COURT OF APPEALS
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Cobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
’ initial confinement and five years’ extended supervision. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶4 Cobbs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31510 - 2008-01-14
State v. Marisol A.
, and extended annually. ¶4 On March 2003, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2008-12-01
, and extended annually. ¶4 On March 2003, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2008-12-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
or extended the deadlines upon a showing of good cause. The no-merit report next addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732662 - 2023-11-28
or extended the deadlines upon a showing of good cause. The no-merit report next addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732662 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentenced Rutherford to thirty years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
sentenced Rutherford to thirty years of initial confinement and twenty years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195483 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP1884 2 agreed to recommend: (1) fifteen years’ initial confinement and ten years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117034 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by five years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Husbeck’s appointed counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
followed by five years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Husbeck’s appointed counsel filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
bifurcated as eighteen months of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770185 - 2024-03-05
bifurcated as eighteen months of initial confinement and eighteen months of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770185 - 2024-03-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by five years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Husbeck’s appointed counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05
followed by five years of extended supervision. On direct appeal, Husbeck’s appointed counsel filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772692 - 2024-03-05