Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11951 - 11960 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.

COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2007-08).[2] O’Connell, who pled guilty after the trial court[3] denied his suppression motion, argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46760 - 2010-02-08

State v. Kelvin Griffin
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motions, which alleged that he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8573 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
court3 denied his suppression motion, argues that his suppression motion should have been granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46760 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Kelvin Griffin
his postconviction motions, which alleged that he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19

[MS WORD] CV-428: Petition for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Injunction (Individual at Risk)
Restraining Order and/or Petition and Motion for Injunction Hearing Solicitud de Orden de Restricción
/formdisplay/CV-428_es.doc?formNumber=CV-428&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=es - 2025-08-08

WI App 41 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1205 Complete Title of...
issue. At a hearing on October 14, 2011, the court made an oral ruling denying the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109323 - 2015-06-03

[PDF] WI APP 41
ruling denying the motion for reconsideration and confirming the award without fees and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109323 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joseph Keepers
2 postconviction motion. On appeal, Keepers argues that at the hearing on his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2284 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court denying Reel’s postconviction motion for plea withdrawal.1 Upon review, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961024 - 2025-05-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Possession of pornography was a violation of Ammerman’s supervision rules. Ammerman was taken into custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160536 - 2017-09-21