Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11951 - 11960 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 11951 - 11960 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. We affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
of initial confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. We affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97633 - 2014-09-15
Racine County v. James P. G.
Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(am) and (13). In this appeal from an order extending the commitment of James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19114 - 2005-07-26
Wis. Stat. § 51.20(1)(am) and (13). In this appeal from an order extending the commitment of James
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19114 - 2005-07-26
State v. Marisol A.
, and extended annually. ¶4 On March 2003, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2005-08-01
, and extended annually. ¶4 On March 2003, the State filed a petition seeking to terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19147 - 2005-08-01
COURT OF APPEALS
and a maximum of seven years on extended supervision. McKoy appeals pro se from the circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
and a maximum of seven years on extended supervision. McKoy appeals pro se from the circuit court’s denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34360 - 2008-10-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 111.322(2m)(a) was amended, effective April 1, 2010, to extend its application to WIS. STAT. § 103.34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
. § 111.322(2m)(a) was amended, effective April 1, 2010, to extend its application to WIS. STAT. § 103.34
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49311 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision. Works first argues that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163178 - 2017-09-21
’ extended supervision. Works first argues that the sentencing court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163178 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision, imposed and stayed, with two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133852 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement and six months of extended supervision, imposed and stayed, with two years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to four years in prison (two years initial confinement, two years extended supervision) and granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21
to four years in prison (two years initial confinement, two years extended supervision) and granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by the court, totaled thirty-five years of initial confinement and twenty-four years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786643 - 2024-04-11
by the court, totaled thirty-five years of initial confinement and twenty-four years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=786643 - 2024-04-11
CA Blank Order
’ initial confinement (I.C.) and fifteen years’ extended supervision (E.S.) on Count 1, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16
’ initial confinement (I.C.) and fifteen years’ extended supervision (E.S.) on Count 1, consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143100 - 2015-06-16