Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11961 - 11970 of 68502 for did.
Search results 11961 - 11970 of 68502 for did.
State v. Kweku Fitzpatrick
and that the prosecutor's reference in closing argument to Fitzpatrick's status as a "convict" did not warrant a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8525 - 2005-03-31
and that the prosecutor's reference in closing argument to Fitzpatrick's status as a "convict" did not warrant a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8525 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman J.
because much of the evidence presented did not support the trial court’s conclusion that he had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
because much of the evidence presented did not support the trial court’s conclusion that he had failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5166 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the State to argue for the maximum penalty on the reduced charge, and the agreement did not contain any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194816 - 2017-09-21
the State to argue for the maximum penalty on the reduced charge, and the agreement did not contain any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194816 - 2017-09-21
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
. Rehrauer testified that at no time when he spoke to Guenterberg did he threaten him with revocation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
. Rehrauer testified that at no time when he spoke to Guenterberg did he threaten him with revocation of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9030 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to suppress as to one item, a knife, that error did not affect Brooks’ substantial rights, and was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48812 - 2014-09-15
to suppress as to one item, a knife, that error did not affect Brooks’ substantial rights, and was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48812 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, and did not confer jurisdiction on the court to proceed with a preliminary hearing; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
, and did not confer jurisdiction on the court to proceed with a preliminary hearing; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49227 - 2010-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
three to four days a week. ¶3 A temporary order found Hamed did not cooperate with providing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45055 - 2009-12-28
three to four days a week. ¶3 A temporary order found Hamed did not cooperate with providing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45055 - 2009-12-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testified that she did not think Lelinski was there in his official capacity, because his presence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108345 - 2017-09-21
testified that she did not think Lelinski was there in his official capacity, because his presence did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108345 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
analysis. Luko told Kocher he would consult with his attorney. When Luko did not contact him, Kocher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35908 - 2014-09-15
analysis. Luko told Kocher he would consult with his attorney. When Luko did not contact him, Kocher
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35908 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as a collateral attack— when the defendant was not represented [by counsel] and did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25
as a collateral attack— when the defendant was not represented [by counsel] and did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=558959 - 2022-08-25