Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11971 - 11980 of 50107 for our.

[PDF] State v. Michael M. Longcore
. Our first concern involves the circuit court’s view that the “reasonable suspicion” may extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14556 - 2017-09-21

Gerald T. Schaetz v. Town of Scott
. Such construction gives full force and effect to these sections. Our analysis does not end
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13792 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶2 We set forth the factual background from our order affirming the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32889 - 2008-06-02

[PDF] State v. Keefe S. Adams
.2d 383, 386 (1983). In construing a statute, our purpose is to ascertain and give effect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10950 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. In Forrett, our supreme court held that Wisconsin’s “OWI statutes are facially unconstitutional
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=764421 - 2024-02-15

Randy S. Caflisch v. Julie Staum
. See Holy Family Covenant v. DOR, 157 Wis. 2d 192, 195, 458 N.W.2d 579 (Ct. App. 1990). Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16084 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Audell Hernandez
. We conclude from our examination of the entire record, including the post-trial motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. State v. Reynolds, 206 Wis. 2d 356, 363, 557 N.W.2d 821 (Ct. App. 1996). ¶9 Our first task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906 (listing circuit court duties). Our review of the record—including
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878176 - 2024-11-19

[PDF] State v. Earl A. Drew
, STATS., is unconstitutional. Finally, he asks that we exercise our power of discretionary reversal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8976 - 2017-09-19