Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11971 - 11980 of 58510 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Steven G. Robillard v. Douglas W. Nardi
. The issues are whether the trial court made erroneous evidentiary rulings during the trial, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2563 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP476-CRNM 3 The matter proceeded to a jury trial in May 2019, which resulted in a mistrial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=626771 - 2023-02-28

[PDF] State v. Charlie Sislo
are to the 2003-04 version unless otherwise noted. No. 2004AP3024-CR 2 on the day the jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18850 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Anthony Watkins
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 947.01 (2003-04). 2 Watkins contends that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Mitchell A. Johnson
court order denying his motion for a new trial. Because we conclude that Johnson was not denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19963 - 2017-09-21

Michael E. Keyes v. Precision Machine & Manufacturing, Inc.
that Keyes pursued in this action derived from his employment relationship with Forge Flite, Inc. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2922 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Pettis
conclude that the trial court met the requirements for taking a no contest plea, we No. 97-1622-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12578 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
PER CURIAM. The State appeals an order granting Brandon Harris a new trial on a charge that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13

COURT OF APPEALS
). He claims that there was insufficient evidence to support the trial court’s finding of guilt. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45245 - 2010-01-04

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and No. 2016AP495-CRNM 2 § 940.01(1)(a) (2011-12). 1 This no-merit appeal follows a four-day jury trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197721 - 2017-10-10