Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 63428 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 and an order denying his motion to reverse the judgment based on trial counsel having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 and an order denying his motion to reverse the judgment based on trial counsel having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170189 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] postconviction motion without a hearing. Because Kline had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135063 - 2015-02-17
denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2011-12)[1] postconviction motion without a hearing. Because Kline had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135063 - 2015-02-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12) 1 postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135063 - 2017-09-21
denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2011-12) 1 postconviction motion without a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2002). In June of 2007, Townsend filed a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
, 2002). In June of 2007, Townsend filed a pro se WIS. STAT. § 974.06 motion claiming that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50752 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Possession of pornography was a violation of Ammerman’s supervision rules. Ammerman was taken into custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160536 - 2017-09-21
. Possession of pornography was a violation of Ammerman’s supervision rules. Ammerman was taken into custody
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160536 - 2017-09-21
Jacqueline C. Schmidt v. Darwin Schmidt
. The trial court denied Darwin’s motion to transport him to the Waukesha County Courthouse for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11898 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied Darwin’s motion to transport him to the Waukesha County Courthouse for trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11898 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Famous Cases of the Wisconsin Supreme Court - In Re: Booth
a federal prisoner in the custody of the U.S. marshal, “it would be his duty to resist it, and to call
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases01.pdf - 2009-11-17
a federal prisoner in the custody of the U.S. marshal, “it would be his duty to resist it, and to call
/courts/supreme/docs/famouscases01.pdf - 2009-11-17
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Sammie L. Glass
the City's motion to dismiss but allowed the City 120 days to implead third parties and to conduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17547 - 2017-09-21
the City's motion to dismiss but allowed the City 120 days to implead third parties and to conduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, probation revocations, and other arrests. After his most recent release from custody, Dumas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195182 - 2017-09-21
, probation revocations, and other arrests. After his most recent release from custody, Dumas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195182 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2006AP285-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2004CF93
moved to suppress inculpatory statements he made while in custody. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29495 - 2014-09-15
moved to suppress inculpatory statements he made while in custody. The circuit court held a hearing
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29495 - 2014-09-15