Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 83662 for case search.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 83662 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
will search the record for reasons to sustain the [trial] court’s discretionary decision.” State v. Thiel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
will search the record for reasons to sustain the [trial] court’s discretionary decision.” State v. Thiel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113094 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for sentence credit purposes, the court reviewed past precedent and noted that numerous cases had defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248686 - 2019-10-16
for sentence credit purposes, the court reviewed past precedent and noted that numerous cases had defined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248686 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=774022 - 2024-03-12
State v. Eric J. Gadach
in plea bargaining … the entire sentencing process is to be a search for the truth and an evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11846 - 2005-03-31
in plea bargaining … the entire sentencing process is to be a search for the truth and an evaluation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11846 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Kielblock v. Hytec Manufacturing, Inc.
on the corporation’s behalf in small claims cases. See WIS. STAT. § 799.06(2); Holz v. Busy Bees Contract., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6761 - 2017-09-20
on the corporation’s behalf in small claims cases. See WIS. STAT. § 799.06(2); Holz v. Busy Bees Contract., 223 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6761 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robert E. Koutnik, Jr.
and “to explore all avenues leading to facts relevant to the merits of the case and the penalty in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4114 - 2005-03-31
and “to explore all avenues leading to facts relevant to the merits of the case and the penalty in the event
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4114 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bradley D. Muck
is a search, is a question of constitutional law that we review without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
is a search, is a question of constitutional law that we review without deference to the trial court. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Danny L. Peterson
explained, this is a case where we will be showing that the person, this informant that they do not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
explained, this is a case where we will be showing that the person, this informant that they do not want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=678665 - 2023-07-19
[PDF]
State v. Maurice W. Carpenter
was reasonable under the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel's conduct. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20
was reasonable under the facts of the particular case, viewed as of the time of counsel's conduct. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10727 - 2017-09-20