Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 28806 for f.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See Village of Slinger, 256 No. 2016AP702 4 Wis. 2d 859, ¶14 (“[I]f the legislature
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185462 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas B.
with approval and, in particular, the following passage from United States v. Parr, 399 F. Supp. 883, 888 (W.D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20795 - 2005-12-27

[PDF] Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Michael Sullivan
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV STATE OF WISCONSIN EX REL. TAYR KILAAB AL GHASHIYAH (KHAN) F/N
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13869 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that the stalking conviction was for a Class F felony. In 2012, this time pro se, Thums again sought sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92653 - 2014-09-15

State v. Jeffrey C. Miller
. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12002 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 18, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appe...
of the sentencing judge.” Ocanas v. State, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). Thus, “[i]f the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109187 - 2014-03-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241928 - 2019-06-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
then filed a supplemental no-merit report. RULE 809.32(1)(e), (f). Upon consideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135071 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tracey T. Williams
judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6242 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Carolyn A. Sullivan
than is necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop. Valance v. Wisel, 110 F.3d 1269, 1276 (7th
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13952 - 2014-09-15