Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 63577 for records.
Search results 11981 - 11990 of 63577 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the form in the record was read in its entirety to Van Ruden. The interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33067 - 2008-06-17
that the form in the record was read in its entirety to Van Ruden. The interpretation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33067 - 2008-06-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694773 - 2023-08-30
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=694773 - 2023-08-30
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
of the administrative record or requiring a response to the petition, dismissed Hughes’s petition under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
of the administrative record or requiring a response to the petition, dismissed Hughes’s petition under Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tomas Rodrequez Consuegra
not appearing on the record.” See Jessen v. State, 95 Wis. 2d 207, 213-14, 290 N.W.2d 685 (1980). Coram nobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
not appearing on the record.” See Jessen v. State, 95 Wis. 2d 207, 213-14, 290 N.W.2d 685 (1980). Coram nobis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14515 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact which support its conclusion, and which are, in turn, supported by the record. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2007-08-06
findings of fact which support its conclusion, and which are, in turn, supported by the record. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29903 - 2007-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 767.511(1j), and that the court failed to comply with § 767.511(1m). The record belies these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283859 - 2020-09-03
. § 767.511(1j), and that the court failed to comply with § 767.511(1m). The record belies these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283859 - 2020-09-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646849 - 2023-04-25
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=646849 - 2023-04-25
State v. Major C. Latimer
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
situations, “a party moving for summary judgment can only demonstrate that there are no facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27023 - 2006-11-06
situations, “a party moving for summary judgment can only demonstrate that there are no facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27023 - 2006-11-06