Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 121 - 130 of 418 for nr.

[PDF] Benjamin C. Roemer v. Department of Natural Resources
for navigation” is further defined in WIS. ADMIN. CODE § NR 325.03(8) to mean that “while possibly floatable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3022 - 2017-09-19

Benjamin C. Roemer v. Department of Natural Resources
on the water. The term “not actually used for navigation” is further defined in Wis. Admin. Code § NR 325.03(8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3022 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, namely WIS. ADMIN. CODE chs. NR 405 and 406. These statutes and regulations relate to controlling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349300 - 2021-03-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that the landfill be operated in a nuisance free and aesthetic manner per [WIS. ADMIN. CODE §] NR 500.08
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258833 - 2020-04-29

COURT OF APPEALS
it displayed in his home. On June 23, 2008, Longo was issued a ticket for a violation of Wis. Admin. Code § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36978 - 2009-06-30

State v. Ronald G. Fedler
The DNR has adopted rules for the construction of Wis. Stat. § 30.19(1) in the Wis. Admin. Code § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4447 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ronald G. Fedler
The DNR has adopted rules for the construction of Wis. Stat. § 30.19(1) in the Wis. Admin. Code § NR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4448 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
]." Wis. Stat. § 59.692(1)(c); see Wis. Admin. Code § NR 115.05 (Jan. 2017). No. 2018AP547
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=328893 - 2021-03-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the provisions of [WIS. STAT. ch. 289 (2021-22)] and [WIS. ADMIN. CODE chs. NR 500-590], any plan approval
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868967 - 2024-10-29

COURT OF APPEALS
of the human environment. Wis. Admin. Code § NR 150.02(16). It does not include actions whose significance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76264 - 2012-01-10