Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1201 - 1210 of 8372 for fronts.

[PDF] State v. Reed Cudnohusky
and Cudnohusky struck the squad's right front bumper, bounced off and scraped his left front side. The backup
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12355 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
then made “a quick left turn in front of [him] without using its turn signal a second time.” Miltimore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124263 - 2017-09-21

State v. David Allen Bruski
“makeup travel case” on the floor of the front passenger seat. Smith later stated that it was not hers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21227 - 2006-03-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” in a bag on the front bench seat of the truck. ¶5 The arresting deputy had Konz perform field sobriety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=894743 - 2024-12-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was [that the man] had a bulge protruding out of his front hooded sweatshirt pocket.” The officer relayed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in the early morning on the day at issue, she heard the sound of car doors slamming and peeked out her front
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210640 - 2018-04-03

[PDF] State v. Encarnacion F.
and searched him while he was waiting for his father in front of the Masonic Temple. Because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14501 - 2017-09-21

City of Madison v. Daniel W. Miller
to the following vehicle, not the vehicle in front. The trial court declined to admit the pages, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11220 - 2005-03-31

T.R. Thompson Builders, Inc. v. City of Madison Zoning Board of Appeals
. Ordinance § 28.03(2) provides that a rear lot line is the line opposite from the front lot line
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2293 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that if Edwards could not pay the change-of-venue fees “up front,” the case would be dismissed without prejudice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86384 - 2014-09-15