Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1201 - 1210 of 96483 for state case.
Search results 1201 - 1210 of 96483 for state case.
State v. Julie Dixon
cases addressing whether a probation extension is appropriate: State v. Davis, 127 Wis.2d 486, 381 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
cases addressing whether a probation extension is appropriate: State v. Davis, 127 Wis.2d 486, 381 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13355 - 2005-03-31
State v. Shawn Schulpius
the petition, State v. Schulpius, Case No. 00-0095 (order of March 14, 2000). After briefing, Schulpius
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
the petition, State v. Schulpius, Case No. 00-0095 (order of March 14, 2000). After briefing, Schulpius
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16350 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bonny Treutelaar
jurisprudence. Fry, 131 Wis.2d at 172, 388 N.W.2d at 573. Thus under both state and federal case law, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11688 - 2017-09-20
jurisprudence. Fry, 131 Wis.2d at 172, 388 N.W.2d at 573. Thus under both state and federal case law, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11688 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Dale Iversen
the trial, the defense presented no witnesses. At the conclusion of the State’s case, the defense also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
the trial, the defense presented no witnesses. At the conclusion of the State’s case, the defense also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14540 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael Schulteis
of attacking the State’s case. Trial counsel argued that the State failed to meet its burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
of attacking the State’s case. Trial counsel argued that the State failed to meet its burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4102 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. James Evans
and the relative importance of [the co- No. 99-0564-CR 4 defendant’s] testimony to the state’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21
and the relative importance of [the co- No. 99-0564-CR 4 defendant’s] testimony to the state’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert Verdone
Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent. v. ROBERT VERDONE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
Title of Case: STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Respondent. v. ROBERT VERDONE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8416 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jamie S.
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN THE INTEREST OF JAMIE S., A PERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11739 - 2017-09-20
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV IN THE INTEREST OF JAMIE S., A PERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11739 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Stephen S.
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11009 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Pamela T.
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 98-0071 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13504 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and RULE 809.62, STATS. No. 98-0071 STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13504 - 2017-09-21