Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12001 - 12010 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 12001 - 12010 of 45854 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
the results of a chemical test of his blood because the Department of Transportation violated the separation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64415 - 2011-05-18
the results of a chemical test of his blood because the Department of Transportation violated the separation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64415 - 2011-05-18
COURT OF APPEALS
refusal to submit to an intoximeter test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 John’s arguments relate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33976 - 2008-09-10
refusal to submit to an intoximeter test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 John’s arguments relate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33976 - 2008-09-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
after a hearing on his refusal to submit to an intoximeter test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 John’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33976 - 2014-09-15
after a hearing on his refusal to submit to an intoximeter test. We affirm the judgment. ¶2 John’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33976 - 2014-09-15
State v. Patricia L. Karch
to submit to chemical testing under § 343.305, Stats., the implied consent statute. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9201 - 2005-03-31
to submit to chemical testing under § 343.305, Stats., the implied consent statute. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a chemical test of his blood because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64415 - 2014-09-15
2 erred in denying his motion to suppress the results of a chemical test of his blood because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64415 - 2014-09-15
State v. William E. Stevenson
to "suppress" evidence that he had refused to submit to field sobriety tests. Stevenson's "suppression" theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10054 - 2005-03-31
to "suppress" evidence that he had refused to submit to field sobriety tests. Stevenson's "suppression" theory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10054 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William E. Stevenson
to "suppress" evidence that he had refused to submit to field sobriety tests. Stevenson's "suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10054 - 2017-09-19
to "suppress" evidence that he had refused to submit to field sobriety tests. Stevenson's "suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10054 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
from a decision of the circuit court denying her motion to suppress evidence of the blood test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
from a decision of the circuit court denying her motion to suppress evidence of the blood test results
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54102 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Donald D. Marshall
.” The officer attempted to have Marshall perform field sobriety tests, but Marshall was unable to stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3998 - 2017-09-20
.” The officer attempted to have Marshall perform field sobriety tests, but Marshall was unable to stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3998 - 2017-09-20
State v. Donald D. Marshall
.” The officer attempted to have Marshall perform field sobriety tests, but Marshall was unable to stand without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3998 - 2005-03-31
.” The officer attempted to have Marshall perform field sobriety tests, but Marshall was unable to stand without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3998 - 2005-03-31