Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 92044 for 1.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 92044 for 1.
[PDF]
Order - IN THE MATTER OF THE TEMPORARY AMENDMENT OF SCRs 31.02 AND 31.05 RELATING TO THE CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS: ON-DEMAND CLE PROGRAMMING
to waive attendance and reporting requirements where to do otherwise would work an injustice).1
/supreme/docs/sco_clereq.pdf - 2022-01-11
to waive attendance and reporting requirements where to do otherwise would work an injustice).1
/supreme/docs/sco_clereq.pdf - 2022-01-11
[PDF]
Age At Disposition Summary - Statewide Report
.-Ordinance (Contested) 495 344 (69%) 50 (80%) 45 (89%) 51 (99%) 1 (99%) 1 (99%) 2 (100%) 1 (100%) 56 TOTAL
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate21.pdf - 2022-05-06
.-Ordinance (Contested) 495 344 (69%) 50 (80%) 45 (89%) 51 (99%) 1 (99%) 1 (99%) 2 (100%) 1 (100%) 56 TOTAL
/publications/statistics/circuit/docs/agedispostate21.pdf - 2022-05-06
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Senators Carpenter, Larson, Spreitzer, Hesselbein and Smith's Response to Motion for Scheduling Order
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NO. 2023AP1399-OA Rebecca Clarke, Ruben
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0802senatorsresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN NO. 2023AP1399-OA Rebecca Clarke, Ruben
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0802senatorsresponse.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1084937 - 2026-03-04
State v. Michael A. Henderson
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael A. Henderson, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Michael A. Henderson, pro se, appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18070 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to first-degree intentional homicide, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.01(1)(a) (2023-24),1 domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990224 - 2025-07-30
to first-degree intentional homicide, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 940.01(1)(a) (2023-24),1 domestic abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990224 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2021AP1072 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Angelo Brooks appeals the circuit court’s order compelling him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564121 - 2022-09-09
). No. 2021AP1072 2 ¶1 PER CURIAM. Angelo Brooks appeals the circuit court’s order compelling him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=564121 - 2022-09-09
CA Blank Order
(2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101125 - 2013-08-18
(2011-12)[1] and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101125 - 2013-08-18
State v. Jimmy Lee Bridges
809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7826 - 2005-03-31
809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7826 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven L. Stoflet
. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Defendant-Appellant, Steven L. Stoflet (Stoflet), appeals the denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10548 - 2005-03-31
. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Defendant-Appellant, Steven L. Stoflet (Stoflet), appeals the denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10548 - 2005-03-31