Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12011 - 12020 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Trial counsel’s failure to investigate incidents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917149 - 2025-02-18
is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. A. Trial counsel’s failure to investigate incidents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917149 - 2025-02-18
[PDF]
WI App 73
perpetrator is an issue of law that we review de novo. Jessica J.L., 223 Wis. 2d at 628; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300183 - 2020-12-08
perpetrator is an issue of law that we review de novo. Jessica J.L., 223 Wis. 2d at 628; see also State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300183 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of intimate parts.” We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict of guilt. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
of intimate parts.” We review de novo the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a verdict of guilt. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=923254 - 2025-03-06
Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Outagamie JUDGE: John A. Des
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31
COURT: Circuit COUNTY: Outagamie JUDGE: John A. Des
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darryl J. Hall
review de novo. See State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d 113, 129, 447 N.W.2d 654, 660 (1989). The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8216 - 2017-09-19
review de novo. See State v. McManus, 152 Wis.2d 113, 129, 447 N.W.2d 654, 660 (1989). The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8216 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert W. Ganley v. Department of Corrections
and for the due process claim, although the prosecutor emphasized that the court would not be making a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12440 - 2017-09-21
and for the due process claim, although the prosecutor emphasized that the court would not be making a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12440 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104912 - 2017-09-21
review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72909 - 2014-09-15
of summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72909 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robin K. v. Lamanda M.
in exercising its discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo." Id. (citing F.R. v. T.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25502 - 2017-09-21
in exercising its discretion presents a question of law, which we review de novo." Id. (citing F.R. v. T.B
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25502 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Sykes
: ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Jeffrey J. De La Rosa
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17870 - 2017-09-21
: ATTORNEYS: For the defendant-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Jeffrey J. De La Rosa
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17870 - 2017-09-21