Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12021 - 12030 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 12021 - 12030 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Gary W. Seavert v. J. M. Remodeling & Home Repair
the findings by the trial court that J. M. Remodeling & Home Repair, Inc. breached a home repair contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21042 - 2005-03-31
the findings by the trial court that J. M. Remodeling & Home Repair, Inc. breached a home repair contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21042 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Janda
is within the trial court’s discretion, see State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 418-19, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2387 - 2005-03-31
is within the trial court’s discretion, see State v. Lechner, 217 Wis. 2d 392, 418-19, 576 N.W.2d 912 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2387 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a jury trial, Pavlovic was convicted of two counts of violating a restraining order and three counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106249 - 2014-01-07
a jury trial, Pavlovic was convicted of two counts of violating a restraining order and three counts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106249 - 2014-01-07
State v. Bernard A. Graef
revoked, and an order denying a new trial.[1] Graef contends that trial counsel was ineffective (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10061 - 2005-03-31
revoked, and an order denying a new trial.[1] Graef contends that trial counsel was ineffective (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10061 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the evidence and issued an oral decision in favor of Tenant.2 Kouri filed a demand for a trial before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782919 - 2024-04-02
the evidence and issued an oral decision in favor of Tenant.2 Kouri filed a demand for a trial before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782919 - 2024-04-02
State v. Aristole E. Farmer, Jr.
committing him to institutional care pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980,[1] and an order denying post-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3459 - 2005-03-31
committing him to institutional care pursuant to Wis. Stat. ch. 980,[1] and an order denying post-trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Aristole E. Farmer, Jr.
and an order denying post-trial relief. Farmer argues: (1) ch. 980 violates due process because it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4834 - 2017-09-19
and an order denying post-trial relief. Farmer argues: (1) ch. 980 violates due process because it does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4834 - 2017-09-19
State v. Randy O. Bohardt
challenges the trial court's exercise of sentencing discretion, arguing that (1) the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10111 - 2005-03-31
challenges the trial court's exercise of sentencing discretion, arguing that (1) the trial court relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10111 - 2005-03-31
Production Stamping Corporation v. Maryland Casualty Company
. Production Stamping claims that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment based on its credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
. Production Stamping claims that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment based on its credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14453 - 2005-03-31
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion seeking sentence modification. We conclude that the trial court properly exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8974 - 2005-03-31