Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12021 - 12030 of 72758 for we.
Search results 12021 - 12030 of 72758 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
GreenStone Farm Credit Services v. Robert M. Giesler
an order denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18265 - 2005-05-23
an order denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18265 - 2005-05-23
Village of Port Edwards v. Greg D. Terry
in custody for twelve hours pursuant to § 345.24(1), Stats. We conclude the twelve-hour hold did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15452 - 2005-03-31
in custody for twelve hours pursuant to § 345.24(1), Stats. We conclude the twelve-hour hold did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15452 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is discriminatory and, therefore, unconstitutional. We see no merit in either of these arguments. This is a strict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28
is discriminatory and, therefore, unconstitutional. We see no merit in either of these arguments. This is a strict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140335 - 2015-04-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Village of Lake Delton v. James A. Roberts
a backyard deck which the Village alleged violated a local setback ordinance. We conclude No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4613 - 2017-09-19
a backyard deck which the Village alleged violated a local setback ordinance. We conclude No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4613 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
GreenStone Farm Credit Services v. Robert M. Giesler
denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18265 - 2017-09-21
denying him attorney fees to which he claimed entitlement as the prevailing party. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18265 - 2017-09-21
Xiaoxia Yu v. Jiayou Zhang
for an award of attorney fees on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. Although we affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
for an award of attorney fees on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. Although we affirm the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Engelking Corporation v. Village of Superior
water through it so he should not be charged. We conclude Engelking waived its right to contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7621 - 2017-09-19
water through it so he should not be charged. We conclude Engelking waived its right to contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7621 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion. We conclude that Morris’ arguments are procedurally barred, and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30
postconviction motion. We conclude that Morris’ arguments are procedurally barred, and we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74543 - 2011-11-30