Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12031 - 12040 of 16073 for probate.
Search results 12031 - 12040 of 16073 for probate.
State v. James Gulley
, and withheld sentence and placed Gulley on probation for the third conviction. The reckless endangerment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
, and withheld sentence and placed Gulley on probation for the third conviction. The reckless endangerment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15238 - 2005-03-31
Carol J. Apyan v. George H. Easton
awarding $72,000 in attorney’s fees to Attorney George H. Easton for his work on the probate estate of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26203 - 2006-08-15
awarding $72,000 in attorney’s fees to Attorney George H. Easton for his work on the probate estate of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26203 - 2006-08-15
State v. Angela Jean Gustum
particularly unsuited to probation. Referring to the length of Gustum’s sentence, the court noted, “It’s going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19859 - 2005-10-10
particularly unsuited to probation. Referring to the length of Gustum’s sentence, the court noted, “It’s going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19859 - 2005-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
and probation on the St. Croix County charge. The court sentenced Meyer to sixteen years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3810 - 2017-09-20
and probation on the St. Croix County charge. The court sentenced Meyer to sixteen years in prison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3810 - 2017-09-20
State v. Charles E. Luitze
sessions. ¶5 Luitze’s probation and parole agent testified that she revoked Luitze for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6606 - 2005-03-31
sessions. ¶5 Luitze’s probation and parole agent testified that she revoked Luitze for his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6606 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
N.W.2d 438, the court held that revocation of probation for refusing to admit the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26583 - 2017-09-21
N.W.2d 438, the court held that revocation of probation for refusing to admit the crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Norgie Vieras
. The trial court went on to state: “So I reject entirely the suggestion that probation has any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19
. The trial court went on to state: “So I reject entirely the suggestion that probation has any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9528 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the reasons for denial as (1) probation/parole status, (2) current charges pending, and (3) past conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172698 - 2017-09-21
the reasons for denial as (1) probation/parole status, (2) current charges pending, and (3) past conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172698 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
only probation. The sentence imposed here, supported by the court’s thorough rationale, was not “so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
only probation. The sentence imposed here, supported by the court’s thorough rationale, was not “so
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121572 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the violations of probation or extended supervision. In contrast, the PSI provided details regarding the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21
of the violations of probation or extended supervision. In contrast, the PSI provided details regarding the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166614 - 2017-09-21