Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12031 - 12040 of 15411 for probate.
Search results 12031 - 12040 of 15411 for probate.
[PDF]
State v. Jason M. Sicard
, and Sicard was placed on five years’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4162 - 2017-09-20
, and Sicard was placed on five years’ probation, consecutive to the ten-year prison term. ¶3 In his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4162 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. This would pose a difficulty for law enforcement officials and probation and parole officials. Id., ¶6. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36795 - 2009-07-28
. This would pose a difficulty for law enforcement officials and probation and parole officials. Id., ¶6. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36795 - 2009-07-28
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
, 2012, and on September 12, 2012 to address comments received from several registers in probate
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102179 - 2017-09-21
, 2012, and on September 12, 2012 to address comments received from several registers in probate
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102179 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jacques Gibson
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
was on probation at the time of [the] offense.” We disagree. First, Gibson cites nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael G. Kachelski
charge and sentenced Kachelski to twelve months in prison, with concurrent probation. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
charge and sentenced Kachelski to twelve months in prison, with concurrent probation. Following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12450 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
by eighteen years of probation. Dahlk appealed his conviction and his appointed counsel filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21
by eighteen years of probation. Dahlk appealed his conviction and his appointed counsel filed a no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bradford J. May
obligations, whether on probation, juvenile supervision or when testifying. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21
obligations, whether on probation, juvenile supervision or when testifying. Because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
, at Murrell’s probation revocation hearing. There, Davis testified that he had not actually seen Murrell drop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71362 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the community but determined that probation would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235764 - 2019-02-20
in the community but determined that probation would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense. Upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235764 - 2019-02-20
COURT OF APPEALS
sides and the presentence investigation report (PSI) recommended probation. Evanich was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14
sides and the presentence investigation report (PSI) recommended probation. Evanich was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34268 - 2008-10-14