Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12041 - 12050 of 63539 for records.
Search results 12041 - 12050 of 63539 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion by imposing an excessive sentence. Because the record reflects that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
discretion by imposing an excessive sentence. Because the record reflects that the trial court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29468 - 2007-06-25
State v. Major C. Latimer
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
not unduly harsh in light of Latimer’s prior criminal record. Accordingly, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15782 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
situations, “a party moving for summary judgment can only demonstrate that there are no facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27023 - 2006-11-06
situations, “a party moving for summary judgment can only demonstrate that there are no facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27023 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
of the administrative record or requiring a response to the No. 02-1480 2 petition, dismissed Hughes’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
of the administrative record or requiring a response to the No. 02-1480 2 petition, dismissed Hughes’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5313 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint that it was the “mortgagee of record and the holder or bearer of the Note.” The Bank attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131889 - 2017-09-21
complaint that it was the “mortgagee of record and the holder or bearer of the Note.” The Bank attached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131889 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
an independent review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=685291 - 2023-07-28
City of Madison v. Vincent N. Spruill, Jr.
. We affirm the decision because the record before us lacks specific, articulable facts necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
. We affirm the decision because the record before us lacks specific, articulable facts necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6810 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arguments on these two issues that apply relevant legal authority to the facts of record, and instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816268 - 2024-06-20
arguments on these two issues that apply relevant legal authority to the facts of record, and instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=816268 - 2024-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. This court has considered counsel’s report and has independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
a response. This court has considered counsel’s report and has independently reviewed the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David E. Bowers
review of the record reveals that Bowers’ attorney had a poor recollection of the events that occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4310 - 2017-09-19
review of the record reveals that Bowers’ attorney had a poor recollection of the events that occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4310 - 2017-09-19