Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12041 - 12050 of 63678 for records/1000.
Search results 12041 - 12050 of 63678 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. Nos. 2023AP95-CR 2023AP96-CR 2 records, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
postconviction motion. Nos. 2023AP95-CR 2023AP96-CR 2 records, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Gary O. McKenzie
for failing to request the 911 tape, the circuit court rejected the claim because the record demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
for failing to request the 911 tape, the circuit court rejected the claim because the record demonstrated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26196 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karl H. Amenson
for release of his presentence investigation report and “ex parte petition for access to medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31
for release of his presentence investigation report and “ex parte petition for access to medical records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5381 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
. Because the record fails to support his contentions, we affirm. No. 95-0928-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8864 - 2017-09-19
. Because the record fails to support his contentions, we affirm. No. 95-0928-CR -2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8864 - 2017-09-19
Wood County Department of Human Services v. Joseph A. R.
a fact-finding date of December 1, 2000, noting on the record that this date would run “a little bit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4797 - 2005-03-31
a fact-finding date of December 1, 2000, noting on the record that this date would run “a little bit over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4797 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Reno D. Coffin
in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7298 - 2017-09-20
in summarily denying his motion without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Because the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7298 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100068 - 2013-07-30
independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment and order may be summarily affirmed because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100068 - 2013-07-30
COURT OF APPEALS
month during the trial period …. Our records reflect that we have not received all of your trial period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11
month during the trial period …. Our records reflect that we have not received all of your trial period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97918 - 2013-06-11
State v. Brian K. John
was, and the defendant’s expectation of privacy is a burden that the defendant has to meet ….” Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15151 - 2005-03-31
was, and the defendant’s expectation of privacy is a burden that the defendant has to meet ….” Because the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15151 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and that it was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. We agree with the trial court that the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15
and that it was not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered. We agree with the trial court that the record contains
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89384 - 2014-09-15