Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12041 - 12050 of 72758 for we.

2009 WI APP 153
its verdict, we may not overturn that verdict even if we believe that the jury should not have found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40492 - 2009-10-27

WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP001738 Complete Titl...
Cities”) and that, therefore, the circuit court erred in granting Hartford’s motion to dismiss. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63157 - 2012-01-22

State v. Stanley D. Sallay
for postconviction relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13070 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his motion for postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218971 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we summarily affirm the order because there are no issues that would have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195811 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
2 circuit court granted a request to restrict Slocum’s access to the judicial system. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Julian C.P.
of $2,388.82. We conclude that the juvenile court did not have authority under § 48.275(1) to require
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7810 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Willard E. Lott
. Assuming for argument’s sake that counsel was ineffective, we agree with the trial court that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14003 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David A. Schlemm v. Jon E. Litscher
raises both substantive and procedural issues. We reject his arguments and affirm. No. 03-0045
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6028 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Port Edwards v. Greg D. Terry
for twelve hours pursuant to § 345.24(1), STATS. We conclude the twelve-hour hold did not constitute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15452 - 2017-09-21