Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12051 - 12060 of 68963 for did.
Search results 12051 - 12060 of 68963 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
during the investigative stop. He argues that the police officer did not articulate with specificity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
during the investigative stop. He argues that the police officer did not articulate with specificity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46270 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
refused, but he did not provide a reason for his refusal. 2 Ultimately, a warrantless, nonconsensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145694 - 2017-09-21
refused, but he did not provide a reason for his refusal. 2 Ultimately, a warrantless, nonconsensual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145694 - 2017-09-21
James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
—in the litigation, both parties did not agree to this fact, and the earning capacity concession was not a legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
—in the litigation, both parties did not agree to this fact, and the earning capacity concession was not a legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
letter and the amended summons and complaint. The legal assistant did not inform the receptionist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
letter and the amended summons and complaint. The legal assistant did not inform the receptionist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86754 - 2012-09-04
State v. Joseph Eckstein
into evidence but did not play the recording in court. The recordings and transcripts corroborated Graham’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
into evidence but did not play the recording in court. The recordings and transcripts corroborated Graham’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attached his records request and the letter from DHS advising that it did not have any responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336151 - 2021-02-17
attached his records request and the letter from DHS advising that it did not have any responsive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336151 - 2021-02-17
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Joe E. Kremkoski
Kremkoski a $500 retainer. Attorney Kremkoski did not file suit on S.S.'s behalf until seven months
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25396 - 2017-09-21
Kremkoski a $500 retainer. Attorney Kremkoski did not file suit on S.S.'s behalf until seven months
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25396 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appearance in court. At a 2006 hearing before a court commissioner, Brister indicated that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211621 - 2018-04-24
appearance in court. At a 2006 hearing before a court commissioner, Brister indicated that he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211621 - 2018-04-24
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
; (2) did not explain why the maximum sentence was appropriate; (3) failed to consider favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
; (2) did not explain why the maximum sentence was appropriate; (3) failed to consider favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6065 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Collins
Collins involving three separate client matters. Collins did not file an answer but instead, he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16819 - 2017-09-21
Collins involving three separate client matters. Collins did not file an answer but instead, he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16819 - 2017-09-21