Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12051 - 12060 of 46120 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test in violation of Wis. Stat. § 343.305(9). He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4208 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Steven C. Hinzmann
from the trial court’s order determining that he unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4208 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of New London v. James E. Knaus
-alcohol test at his jury trial, he waived his right to challenge the City of New London’s compliance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4809 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Dennis J. Reitter
test under Wisconsin's implied consent statute, Wis. Stat. § 343.305. A related question, whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17383 - 2017-09-21

State v. Dennis J. Reitter
of a chemical test under Wisconsin's implied consent statute, Wis. Stat. § 343.305. A related question, whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17383 - 2005-03-31

County of Green Lake v. John F. Lindemann
-part test to use when an allegedly intoxicated driver claims that he or she refused to take a test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4818 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] County of Green Lake v. John F. Lindemann
a three-part test to use when an allegedly intoxicated driver claims that he or she refused to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4818 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Thomas M. Maguire
to submit to a chemical test of his blood 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13603 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas M. Maguire
unlawfully refused to submit to a chemical test of his blood and directing that his operating privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13603 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures." U.S. Const. amend. IV
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46694 - 2010-02-08