Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12061 - 12070 of 18724 for quote.
Search results 12061 - 12070 of 18724 for quote.
COURT OF APPEALS
quotes the provision to suggest that another home visit shall be made if within the thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
quotes the provision to suggest that another home visit shall be made if within the thirty days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34541 - 2008-11-11
James H. Gold v. City of Adams
% of the yearly income has been reached. As suggested by the quoted language, the longevity bonus was calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3912 - 2005-03-31
% of the yearly income has been reached. As suggested by the quoted language, the longevity bonus was calculated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3912 - 2005-03-31
State v. Corey R. Saxby
Wis. 2d at 512 (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 531). Likewise, any delay that is “attributable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5967 - 2005-03-31
Wis. 2d at 512 (quoting Barker, 407 U.S. at 531). Likewise, any delay that is “attributable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5967 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(quoting Winnebago Homes, Inc. v. Sheldon, 29 Wis. 2d 692, 699, 139 N.W.2d 606 (1966)). “A party proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87751 - 2012-10-09
(quoting Winnebago Homes, Inc. v. Sheldon, 29 Wis. 2d 692, 699, 139 N.W.2d 606 (1966)). “A party proves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87751 - 2012-10-09
State v. Chauncer L. Smith
. (quoting State v. Tronca, 84 Wis.2d 68, 86, 267 N.W.2d 216 (1978)). However, a statute is not void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11566 - 2005-03-31
. (quoting State v. Tronca, 84 Wis.2d 68, 86, 267 N.W.2d 216 (1978)). However, a statute is not void
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11566 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
with the individual’s needs.” Id. (quoting WIS. STAT. § 51.20(13)(c)2.). ¶17 Here, Ashley argues that her due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48124 - 2014-09-15
with the individual’s needs.” Id. (quoting WIS. STAT. § 51.20(13)(c)2.). ¶17 Here, Ashley argues that her due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48124 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and quoted source omitted). No. 2011AP539-CR 8 ¶18 Indeed, this case is quite similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75748 - 2014-09-15
and quoted source omitted). No. 2011AP539-CR 8 ¶18 Indeed, this case is quite similar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75748 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
] would not lead to a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury.” Id. at 660 (quoting State v. McCallum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185894 - 2017-09-21
] would not lead to a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury.” Id. at 660 (quoting State v. McCallum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185894 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
decision, although the [circuit] court’s decision is not controlling.’” Id. (quoting Wassenaar v. Panos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36582 - 2014-09-15
decision, although the [circuit] court’s decision is not controlling.’” Id. (quoting Wassenaar v. Panos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36582 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court reconstruct the record to determine the identity of the two venirepersons quoted above who “gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05
that the court reconstruct the record to determine the identity of the two venirepersons quoted above who “gave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=675537 - 2023-07-05