Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12071 - 12080 of 73032 for we.
Search results 12071 - 12080 of 73032 for we.
[PDF]
Village of Lake Delton v. James A. Roberts
a backyard deck which the Village alleged violated a local setback ordinance. We conclude No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4613 - 2017-09-19
a backyard deck which the Village alleged violated a local setback ordinance. We conclude No. 01
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4613 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Richard L. Drager
standard of probable cause and the State failed to carry its burden of proof for revocation. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25310 - 2017-09-21
standard of probable cause and the State failed to carry its burden of proof for revocation. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25310 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Emerson
that the court failed to comply with statutory sentencing requirements. We agree and reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6737 - 2017-09-20
that the court failed to comply with statutory sentencing requirements. We agree and reverse the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6737 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
appeals from a judgment dividing property in a nonmarital cohabitation case. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30504 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
. STAT. § 808.03(1) (2023-24),1 we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this premature no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079261 - 2026-02-18
. STAT. § 808.03(1) (2023-24),1 we conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this premature no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1079261 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
Jerry Lu Epstein v. John T. Benson
conduct in this case clearly violated these statutory dictates, we affirm the circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8681 - 2017-09-19
conduct in this case clearly violated these statutory dictates, we affirm the circuit court order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8681 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections relating to a disciplinary proceeding.[2] We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
with the Wisconsin Department of Corrections relating to a disciplinary proceeding.[2] We affirm for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60265 - 2011-02-23
[PDF]
State v. Joseph L. Van Patten
not deny Van Patten his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We agree with the State and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
not deny Van Patten his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We agree with the State and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11600 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and dismissed the action. We conclude that the Town accepted the plat and the dedication of Proverbs Pass. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114928 - 2017-09-21
, and dismissed the action. We conclude that the Town accepted the plat and the dedication of Proverbs Pass. 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114928 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 circuit court granted a request to restrict Slocum’s access to the judicial system. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21
2 circuit court granted a request to restrict Slocum’s access to the judicial system. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186257 - 2017-09-21