Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12071 - 12080 of 73061 for we.
Search results 12071 - 12080 of 73061 for we.
[PDF]
State v. Geoffrey K. Turk
. We agree with the trial court that when two police officers, one with a drawn gun, forced Turk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13210 - 2017-09-21
. We agree with the trial court that when two police officers, one with a drawn gun, forced Turk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13210 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 plea withdrawal. We conclude that Hashim failed to make the necessary showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 plea withdrawal. We conclude that Hashim failed to make the necessary showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66673 - 2014-09-15
State v. Xavier R. Neave
. Because § 973.06(1), Stats., does not recognize such expenditure as an allowable taxable cost, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13324 - 2005-03-31
. Because § 973.06(1), Stats., does not recognize such expenditure as an allowable taxable cost, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to modify the rules of his extended supervision (ES). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670983 - 2023-06-27
to modify the rules of his extended supervision (ES). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670983 - 2023-06-27
COURT OF APPEALS
a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
a change of venue, and failing to challenge a juror at voir dire. We affirm for the reasons discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71879 - 2011-10-05
David A. Schlemm v. Jon E. Litscher
. He raises both substantive and procedural issues. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6028 - 2005-03-31
. He raises both substantive and procedural issues. We reject his arguments and affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6028 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535120 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to raise it on direct appeal or in a prior postconviction motion. We conclude that Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
failed to raise it on direct appeal or in a prior postconviction motion. We conclude that Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74543 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stanley D. Sallay
for postconviction relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13070 - 2005-03-31
for postconviction relief. We reject Sallay’s arguments that: (1) trial counsel was ineffective; (2) Sallay should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13070 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to determine the credibility of the evidence produced. We reject each of these claims for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15
to determine the credibility of the evidence produced. We reject each of these claims for the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90908 - 2014-09-15