Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12081 - 12090 of 18721 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.” State v. Sutton, 2006 WI App 118, ¶16, 294 Wis. 2d 330, 718 N.W.2d 146 (quoting Broadie v. State, 68
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252249 - 2020-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS
640, 667, 581 N.W.2d 567 (Ct. App. 1998) (quoting State v. Hicks, 202 Wis. 2d 150, 160, 549 N.W.2d 435
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134783 - 2015-02-10

[PDF] NOTICE
) the representation materially induced (caused) a pecuniary loss to the plaintiff.” Novell, 2008 WI 44, ¶49 (quoted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33689 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rogelio Cabral v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
quoted liberally from Professor Arthur Larson's treatise, 2 Worker's Compensation Law, § 57.51, page 10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8390 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
359, ¶25 (quoting WIS. STAT. § 51.20(1)(a)2.e.). Pertinent to the element, Bales opined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207504 - 2018-01-23

State v. Dequelvin M. Douglas
in the outcome’ of the proceeding.” Id. at 544-45, 370 N.W.2d at 232 (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12005 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 31
, and quotes directly from the appellate decision. This is a blatant violation of Rule 809.23(3), of which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59779 - 2012-01-22

COURT OF APPEALS
such arguments. See State v. Caban, 210 Wis. 2d 597, 604, 563 N.W.2d 501 (1997). Moreover, the above quote
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135522 - 2015-02-23

Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
service. Despite Bartels’s broad pronouncement, the footnote immediately following that quoted language
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25

COURT OF APPEALS
] court’s decision, although the [circuit] court’s decision is not controlling.’” Id. (quoting Wassenaar v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36582 - 2009-05-26