Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 57630 for a i x.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 57630 for a i x.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2006AP2819 Cir. Ct. No. 2005TP286 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29136 - 2007-05-21
. Appeal No. 2006AP2819 Cir. Ct. No. 2005TP286 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29136 - 2007-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
Troka’s motion for reconsideration. For the reasons explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
Troka’s motion for reconsideration. For the reasons explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. All right. I don’t want your hands going in your pockets anymore. [Wagner]: OK. [Detaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135547 - 2017-09-21
. All right. I don’t want your hands going in your pockets anymore. [Wagner]: OK. [Detaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135547 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. John J. Quinn
, “This says I can have a second test. I want a second test.” Hall testified that he never heard Quinn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3025 - 2017-09-19
, “This says I can have a second test. I want a second test.” Hall testified that he never heard Quinn’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3025 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Cox for impaired driving. I conclude that he did, and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
the officer had reasonable suspicion to stop Cox for impaired driving. I conclude that he did, and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
COURT OF APPEALS
as a result of an illegal seizure. Because I conclude that the police officer’s contact with Vogt constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13
as a result of an illegal seizure. Because I conclude that the police officer’s contact with Vogt constituted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2013-03-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
explained below, I affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103152 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
testified she was in the house when she heard Clesen yell, “I didn’t threaten your wife, I didn’t threaten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23
testified she was in the house when she heard Clesen yell, “I didn’t threaten your wife, I didn’t threaten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33147 - 2008-06-23
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 29, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
individually). She responded:[3] Well I believe when they told us that they would fix our house that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28
individually). She responded:[3] Well I believe when they told us that they would fix our house that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27250 - 2006-11-28
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
the sample to the State Hygiene Laboratory. There, he had “the analyst who I physically turn over the sealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31
the sample to the State Hygiene Laboratory. There, he had “the analyst who I physically turn over the sealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31