Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 30123 for de.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 30123 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 14, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
. Our review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28421 - 2007-03-13
. Our review of a constitutional fact on the grounds of established historical fact, however, is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28421 - 2007-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel claim is a question of law that appellate courts review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97549 - 2013-06-03
2007 WI App 19
and remanded 2006AP001533 City of Eau Claire v. Kenneth R. Van De Hei
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28112 - 2007-03-11
and remanded 2006AP001533 City of Eau Claire v. Kenneth R. Van De Hei
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28112 - 2007-03-11
Village of Pleasant Prairie v. Maureen M. McCarragher
is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5989 - 2005-03-31
is de novo. See State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 54, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5989 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Betty Pichelman v. Arnold Barfknecht
. Our review of summary judgment is de novo, that is, without deference to the circuit court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8689 - 2017-09-19
. Our review of summary judgment is de novo, that is, without deference to the circuit court's decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8689 - 2017-09-19
State v. James R. Bolstad
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
of the parties." State v. Prince, 147 Wis.2d 134, 136, 432 N.W.2d 646, 647 (Ct. App. 1988). We review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8481 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arthur C. List
interpretation of relevant Wisconsin statutes. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
interpretation of relevant Wisconsin statutes. We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7072 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael A. Blackmon
review de novo. See id. In examining prejudice, the question is whether counsel’s errors were so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13836 - 2014-09-15
review de novo. See id. In examining prejudice, the question is whether counsel’s errors were so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13836 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law … we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168206 - 2017-09-21
the constitutional requirement of reasonableness is a question of law … we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168206 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112563 - 2017-09-21
particular case presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112563 - 2017-09-21