Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 17255 for probate/1000.
Search results 12091 - 12100 of 17255 for probate/1000.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
convicted. On October 23, 2000, sentence was withheld with Attorney Hunsick placed on probation for 18
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16505 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in 1988, was placed on probation, and then committed another robbery in 1989. He was then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52521 - 2010-07-26
in 1988, was placed on probation, and then committed another robbery in 1989. He was then sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52521 - 2010-07-26
State v. Harrison M. Marcum
of probation consecutive to the first sentence. On his direct appeal, we ordered that the second count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
of probation consecutive to the first sentence. On his direct appeal, we ordered that the second count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25003 - 2006-05-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
revocation of Robbins’s extended supervision and probation and investigate whether Robbins faced two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217483 - 2018-08-15
revocation of Robbins’s extended supervision and probation and investigate whether Robbins faced two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217483 - 2018-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Marshall B. Murray Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Josh Steib Register in Probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480730 - 2022-02-08
. Marshall B. Murray Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Josh Steib Register in Probate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480730 - 2022-02-08
COURT OF APPEALS
of this subsection is 5 years. If the court places the person on probation or imposes a sentence less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59173 - 2011-01-24
of this subsection is 5 years. If the court places the person on probation or imposes a sentence less than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59173 - 2011-01-24
CA Blank Order
’ recommendation of probation and conditional jail time and sentenced him to two years’ initial confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117081 - 2014-07-15
’ recommendation of probation and conditional jail time and sentenced him to two years’ initial confinement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117081 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in favor of two years of probation, and imposed sixty days in jail as a condition. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290961 - 2020-09-29
in favor of two years of probation, and imposed sixty days in jail as a condition. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=290961 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
to six years in prison followed by four years' probation. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10863 - 2017-09-20
to six years in prison followed by four years' probation. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10863 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
to six years in prison followed by four years' probation. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20
to six years in prison followed by four years' probation. The no merit report addresses whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10866 - 2017-09-20