Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 83803 for case code.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 83803 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, MUN. CODE ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106847 - 2017-09-21
, MUN. CODE ch. 26, art. II (2007). Despite being denied an exemption and without applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106847 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234567 - 2019-02-08
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234567 - 2019-02-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
This case concerns a Department of Revenue assessment of sales and use taxes against Visu-Sewer. Visu
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30503 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
real property construction activity. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns a Department of Revenue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30503 - 2007-10-03
[PDF]
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
is in the best interest of the child.” Sec. 767.451(1)(b)2.b. ¶18 In this case, Gregerson does not dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350816 - 2021-03-30
Must a judge testify when subpoenaed?
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
case. The judge may be asked to testify as to facts and character. The judge is not hearing the case
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=903 - 2005-03-31
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
________________________________________________________________________ ISSUES 1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39804 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
1. Must a judge recuse himself or herself from hearing the cases in drug court of participants who
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39804 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
2008 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP934 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32107 - 2008-04-29
2008 WI App 58 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP934 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32107 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
Mary Kay McCallum v. Marathon County Board of Adjustment
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20
to MARATHON COUNTY, WIS., ZONING CODE §17.08 (1998), “special exception” is defined as follows: “Uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4015 - 2017-09-20