Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 2575 for dnr.

COURT OF APPEALS
she did not file a reply brief or otherwise attempt to refute it. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29731 - 2007-07-17

[PDF] Terrance McKillop v. County of Kenosha
than the regulations adopted by the DNR. Kenosha County has chosen to adopt a more restrictive zoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10199 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the defendant. DNR v. Walworth Cnty. Bd. of Adjustment, 170 Wis. 2d 406, 415-19, 489 N.W.2d 631 (Ct. App
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297752 - 2020-10-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, a genuine issue does not exist. See Baxter v. DNR, 165 Wis. 2d 298, 312, 477 N.W.2d 648 (Ct. App. 1991
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96469 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
, that method is exclusive. Sewerage Comm’n of Milwaukee v. DNR, 102 Wis. 2d 613, 630, 307 N.W.2d 189 (1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52615 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Rebecca A. Yager v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
, resulting in this appeal. We review LIRC’s decision, not the circuit court’s. See Barnes v. DNR, 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14396 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 63
discretion); Rotfeld v. DNR, 147 Wis. 2d 720, 726, 434 N.W.2d 617 (Ct. App. 1988) (The word “may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96064 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
‘if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.’” Baxter v. DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35673 - 2008-06-11

Local 1287 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
, Inc. v. DNR, 223 Wis. 2d 138, 148, 588 N.W.2d 667 (Ct. App. 1998). Substantial evidence is relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6414 - 2005-03-31

City of West Allis v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
(DNR) issued an order requiring the City to remediate its property. In 1992, the DNR inspected K&T’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2602 - 2005-03-31