Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 2403 for nys.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 2403 for nys.
2008 WI APP 107
be deemed timely filed but from that point forward “[a]ny papers or documents delivered or received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33134 - 2008-07-29
be deemed timely filed but from that point forward “[a]ny papers or documents delivered or received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33134 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
WI APP 95
, states that “[a]ny person, including the state or any political subdivision of the state, violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50839 - 2014-09-15
, states that “[a]ny person, including the state or any political subdivision of the state, violating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the fair market value of property in a condemnation case. Id., ¶12. “[A]ny factor affecting the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120484 - 2014-09-15
the fair market value of property in a condemnation case. Id., ¶12. “[A]ny factor affecting the value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120484 - 2014-09-15
Winnebago County v. Harold W.
the duration and review of a guardianship appointment, “[a]ny guardianship of an individual found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11465 - 2005-03-31
the duration and review of a guardianship appointment, “[a]ny guardianship of an individual found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11465 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
consider such a charge at all.[2] However, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(b) defines a read-in charge as: [a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-10-02
consider such a charge at all.[2] However, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(1g)(b) defines a read-in charge as: [a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30433 - 2007-10-02
COURT OF APPEALS
his cell phone.” As the State aptly explains in its brief, “[a]ny suggestion that Anderson had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
his cell phone.” As the State aptly explains in its brief, “[a]ny suggestion that Anderson had made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122726 - 2014-09-29
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Harold W.
., which governs the duration and review of a guardianship appointment, “[a]ny guardianship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11465 - 2017-09-19
., which governs the duration and review of a guardianship appointment, “[a]ny guardianship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11465 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 94
, in relevant part, as [a]ny of the following types of intentional touching, whether direct or through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153285 - 2017-09-21
, in relevant part, as [a]ny of the following types of intentional touching, whether direct or through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153285 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
ordinances. WISCONSIN STAT. § 806.04(2) provides that “[a]ny person … whose rights, status or other legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27536 - 2014-09-15
ordinances. WISCONSIN STAT. § 806.04(2) provides that “[a]ny person … whose rights, status or other legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27536 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had “neglected to cover with her.” The trial court said it would permit testimony from “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171527 - 2017-09-21
had “neglected to cover with her.” The trial court said it would permit testimony from “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171527 - 2017-09-21