Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 49848 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 1211 - 1220 of 49848 for writ of certiorari forms.
[PDF]
NOTICE
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
a circuit court order that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40305 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
that affirmed a prison disciplinary decision on certiorari review. For the reasons discussed below, we also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40305 - 2009-09-02
[PDF]
William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
to challenge an administrative order revoking probation, since a writ of certiorari is available
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17551 - 2017-09-21
to challenge an administrative order revoking probation, since a writ of certiorari is available
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17551 - 2017-09-21
William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
that the extraordinary remedy of release pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus is proper. Habeas corpus relief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17551 - 2005-03-31
that the extraordinary remedy of release pursuant to a writ of habeas corpus is proper. Habeas corpus relief
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17551 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mark Price v. Gary R. McCaughtry
dismissing his petition for certiorari review of a prison disciplinary decision. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
dismissing his petition for certiorari review of a prison disciplinary decision. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2675 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 64
should have reviewed the Town’s decision applying certiorari review because WIS. STAT. § 74.35(3)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726104 - 2024-01-18
should have reviewed the Town’s decision applying certiorari review because WIS. STAT. § 74.35(3)(d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=726104 - 2024-01-18
Daniel Frasch v. Marianne A. Cooke
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
. The Department contends that Frasch is not entitled to certiorari review because (1) Frasch did not demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14186 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
revocation is obtained by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. See State ex rel. Washington v. Schwarz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135522 - 2017-09-21
revocation is obtained by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. See State ex rel. Washington v. Schwarz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135522 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. See State ex rel. Washington v. Schwarz, 2000 WI App 235, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135522 - 2015-02-23
by writ of certiorari to the circuit court. See State ex rel. Washington v. Schwarz, 2000 WI App 235, ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135522 - 2015-02-23
Jesse Hardy Swinson v. Roger Blacksheaer
that conclusion, we note that Swinson does not ask, if we conclude certiorari is the appropriate form of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21786 - 2006-03-15
that conclusion, we note that Swinson does not ask, if we conclude certiorari is the appropriate form of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21786 - 2006-03-15