Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12101 - 12110 of 49819 for our.
Search results 12101 - 12110 of 49819 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 721, ¶26. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
. 2d 721, ¶26. A reasonable probability is one that undermines our confidence in the outcome. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35560 - 2009-02-17
[PDF]
WI 109
court judges but only 23 appellate judges. In addition, during our in-state judicial education
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206164 - 2017-12-21
court judges but only 23 appellate judges. In addition, during our in-state judicial education
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206164 - 2017-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158071 - 2017-09-21
and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158071 - 2017-09-21
State v. Keefe S. Adams
). In construing a statute, our purpose is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent. Dieckhoff v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10950 - 2005-03-31
). In construing a statute, our purpose is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent. Dieckhoff v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10950 - 2005-03-31
Tayr Kilaab Al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Kenneth Morgan
Our scope of review is identical to the trial court’s on certiorari. See State ex rel. Staples v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15385 - 2005-03-31
Our scope of review is identical to the trial court’s on certiorari. See State ex rel. Staples v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15385 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ rehabilitative efforts while incarcerated. I reject this argument because, as the State points out, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649957 - 2023-04-27
’ rehabilitative efforts while incarcerated. I reject this argument because, as the State points out, our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=649957 - 2023-04-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when they are accepted for eFiling. As our supreme court explained when it amended the rule, the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
when they are accepted for eFiling. As our supreme court explained when it amended the rule, the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987548 - 2025-07-24
[PDF]
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15
conducting statutory certiorari judicial review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15
State v. Marjorie M. Veeser
our “totality of the circumstances” standard. ¶13 We have no doubt that Sara was upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31
our “totality of the circumstances” standard. ¶13 We have no doubt that Sara was upset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5194 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward Lee Hennings
the postconviction motions. Our supreme court denied Hennings’s petition for review. He then filed a pro se Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16144 - 2005-03-31
the postconviction motions. Our supreme court denied Hennings’s petition for review. He then filed a pro se Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16144 - 2005-03-31