Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12101 - 12110 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 12101 - 12110 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Dean P. Lenz
decision. No. 99-0670-CR 2 contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15246 - 2017-09-21
decision. No. 99-0670-CR 2 contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15246 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and claiming that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and claiming that his plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149114 - 2017-09-21
Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison
to § 706.04, Stats., and (2) the trial court erroneously based its denial of relief on the unauthorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11599 - 2005-03-31
to § 706.04, Stats., and (2) the trial court erroneously based its denial of relief on the unauthorized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11599 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of force. He further contends that he is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79931 - 2012-03-27
of force. He further contends that he is entitled to a new trial because his right to be present at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79931 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
Lyman Lumber of Wisconsin, Inc. v. First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison
) it is entitled to reformation of its mortgage pursuant to § 706.04, STATS., and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11599 - 2017-09-19
) it is entitled to reformation of its mortgage pursuant to § 706.04, STATS., and (2) the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11599 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Tallie argues his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88163 - 2012-10-15
denying his motion for postconviction relief.[1] Tallie argues his trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88163 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a new trial based on alleged No. 2006AP3079-CR 2 ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30812 - 2014-09-15
for a new trial based on alleged No. 2006AP3079-CR 2 ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30812 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postconviction No. 2012AP42-CR 2 relief.1 Tallie argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
motion for postconviction No. 2012AP42-CR 2 relief.1 Tallie argues his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88163 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, which ultimately caused him to be prejudiced in the eyes of the jury. Turner also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
trial, which ultimately caused him to be prejudiced in the eyes of the jury. Turner also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73203 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Prentiss L. Farr
that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing Farr and affirm. Farr was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing Farr and affirm. Farr was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8974 - 2017-09-19