Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12111 - 12120 of 92044 for 1.
Search results 12111 - 12120 of 92044 for 1.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James and Tara Hall, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. James and Tara Hall, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87675 - 2012-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Verdone
of § 946.41(1), STATS.1 This court rejects his challenges and affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8779 - 2017-09-19
of § 946.41(1), STATS.1 This court rejects his challenges and affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8779 - 2017-09-19
Burton Davis v. Elizabeth Schultz-Davis
erroneously exercised its discretion[1] because it failed to explicitly apply ch. 785, Stats. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9985 - 2005-03-31
erroneously exercised its discretion[1] because it failed to explicitly apply ch. 785, Stats. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9985 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2013-14).[1] As Austin failed to file his notice of appeal within ninety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141483 - 2015-05-12
Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21(1) (2013-14).[1] As Austin failed to file his notice of appeal within ninety
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141483 - 2015-05-12
[PDF]
City of Neenah v. Michael A. Bellin
) contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He raises two arguments on appeal challenging the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15106 - 2017-09-21
) contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He raises two arguments on appeal challenging the sufficiency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15106 - 2017-09-21
May a judge meet in chambers with a representative of a special interest group without violating the Code of Judicial Ethics?
60.03(2) and 60.04(1)(b) and (g). A. SCR 60.03(2) SCR 60.03(2) states in part
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
60.03(2) and 60.04(1)(b) and (g). A. SCR 60.03(2) SCR 60.03(2) states in part
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=885 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric L. Hansen
failure to move to suppress Hansen’s confession. We conclude that Hansen failed to demonstrate: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10578 - 2005-03-31
failure to move to suppress Hansen’s confession. We conclude that Hansen failed to demonstrate: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Wisconsin v. T.A.E. (L.C. #2016TP167) Before Gundrum, J. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207806 - 2018-01-31
of Wisconsin v. T.A.E. (L.C. #2016TP167) Before Gundrum, J. 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207806 - 2018-01-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229325 - 2018-12-03
this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2015-16). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229325 - 2018-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Steven L. Stoflet
. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Defendant-Appellant, Steven L. Stoflet (Stoflet), appeals the denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10548 - 2017-09-20
. ROGGENSACK, J.1 Defendant-Appellant, Steven L. Stoflet (Stoflet), appeals the denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10548 - 2017-09-20