Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12111 - 12120 of 68926 for he.
Search results 12111 - 12120 of 68926 for he.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
while he was incarcerated at the Brown County Jail. These statements were made after the charge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143174 - 2017-09-21
while he was incarcerated at the Brown County Jail. These statements were made after the charge
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143174 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
made to investigators while he was incarcerated at the Brown County Jail. These statements were made
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143174 - 2015-06-15
made to investigators while he was incarcerated at the Brown County Jail. These statements were made
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143174 - 2015-06-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Lira argues that he is entitled to sentence credit against his 1992 and 1999 sentences for time he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455038 - 2022-01-20
Lira argues that he is entitled to sentence credit against his 1992 and 1999 sentences for time he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455038 - 2022-01-20
State v. Elgine L. Storlie
testified he met Storlie at a bar and they decided to go to another location. The passenger denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2853 - 2005-03-31
testified he met Storlie at a bar and they decided to go to another location. The passenger denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2853 - 2005-03-31
State v. Elgine L. Storlie
testified he met Storlie at a bar and they decided to go to another location. The passenger denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2608 - 2005-03-31
testified he met Storlie at a bar and they decided to go to another location. The passenger denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2608 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) as a second and subsequent offense. Schmidt- Sharkey argues: (1) he was denied his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216057 - 2018-07-24
) as a second and subsequent offense. Schmidt- Sharkey argues: (1) he was denied his constitutional right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216057 - 2018-07-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the second jury trial on the charges in April 2014. He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211136 - 2018-06-21
the second jury trial on the charges in April 2014. He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211136 - 2018-06-21
Frontsheet
that "there is probable cause to believe that the juvenile has committed the violation of which he or she is accused under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
that "there is probable cause to believe that the juvenile has committed the violation of which he or she is accused under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117785 - 2014-07-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an incident involving a woman with whom he previously had a romantic relationship. Two months later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249795 - 2019-11-05
an incident involving a woman with whom he previously had a romantic relationship. Two months later
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249795 - 2019-11-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and for operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration. He contends that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30695 - 2007-10-30
and for operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration. He contends that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30695 - 2007-10-30