Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12121 - 12130 of 16449 for commentating.
Search results 12121 - 12130 of 16449 for commentating.
[PDF]
State v. Wilfred E. Tobias
. One commentator has noted that although the Court in Brown did not directly relate the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19
. One commentator has noted that although the Court in Brown did not directly relate the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8597 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rovaughn Hill
and the inadequacy of the evidence the State had presented, Hill points to: the court’s comments on the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2196 - 2017-09-19
and the inadequacy of the evidence the State had presented, Hill points to: the court’s comments on the second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2196 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to the annexation agreement both at the public hearing and during a subsequent comment period, asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
to the annexation agreement both at the public hearing and during a subsequent comment period, asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56776 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not. Moreover, the court stated in its comments at sentencing that J.S. had hit Xiong with a baseball bat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240263 - 2019-05-07
not. Moreover, the court stated in its comments at sentencing that J.S. had hit Xiong with a baseball bat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240263 - 2019-05-07
D.M.K., Inc. v. Town of Pittsfield
questioned D.M.K.’s ability to take only one or two contracts because of an earlier comment by D.M.K.’s owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21557 - 2006-03-22
questioned D.M.K.’s ability to take only one or two contracts because of an earlier comment by D.M.K.’s owner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21557 - 2006-03-22
State v. Michael R.
. It was not improper for the court to comment on the seriousness of the problem of gang activity in the community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9173 - 2005-03-31
. It was not improper for the court to comment on the seriousness of the problem of gang activity in the community
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kevin J. Pok v. David E. McCauley
) in improperly commenting on the evidence through the use of the duty to stop jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8318 - 2017-09-19
) in improperly commenting on the evidence through the use of the duty to stop jury instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8318 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lisa B. v. William J.T., Sr.
to represent the interest of the child. The comment by Ms. Smith was close. But given the context within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
to represent the interest of the child. The comment by Ms. Smith was close. But given the context within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7675 - 2017-09-19
State v. Mark A. Walters
, the trial court used the phrase "not competent" as a comment on Walters' knowledge of legal procedure while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court used the phrase "not competent" as a comment on Walters' knowledge of legal procedure while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Hinchey
the investigator’s testimony constituted impermissible comment on the credibility of another witness presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5930 - 2017-09-19
the investigator’s testimony constituted impermissible comment on the credibility of another witness presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5930 - 2017-09-19