Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12121 - 12130 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 12121 - 12130 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis.2d 628, 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14347 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allen Tony Davis
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See id., 124 Wis. 2d at 634, 369 N.W.2d at 715. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15911 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. We review de novo whether exclusion of evidence implicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110702 - 2017-09-21
that a reasonable judge could reach. Id. We review de novo whether exclusion of evidence implicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110702 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roberta L. Brunell v. Miljevich Corporation
. Doughboy Recreational, 160 Wis.2d 547, 559, 466 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1991). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14308 - 2014-09-15
. Doughboy Recreational, 160 Wis.2d 547, 559, 466 N.W.2d 897, 902 (1991). Our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14308 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Manitowoc County v. Leesa J.Y.
on the merits. We review a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14347 - 2014-09-15
on the merits. We review a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
exists for the failure to previously assert the claim present questions of law we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=989789 - 2025-07-30
Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
which we determine de novo. State ex rel. Darby v. Litscher, 2002 WI App 258, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 270, 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5798 - 2005-03-31
which we determine de novo. State ex rel. Darby v. Litscher, 2002 WI App 258, ¶7, 258 Wis. 2d 270, 653
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probability of a different trial result exists is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Miller contends that he “should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
probability of a different trial result exists is reviewed de novo. Id. ¶10 Miller contends that he “should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913352 - 2025-02-11
CA Blank Order
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112563 - 2014-05-13
that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563 N.W.2d 175 (Ct. App. 1997
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112563 - 2014-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. ¶14 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05
a postconviction motion is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶30. ¶14 The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872007 - 2024-11-05