Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12141 - 12150 of 19049 for citi.
Search results 12141 - 12150 of 19049 for citi.
Kevin Giffin v. Gary Poetzl
. City of Madison, 113 Wis. 2d 112, 115, 334 N.W.2d 580 (Ct. App. 1983). An appellate court as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
. City of Madison, 113 Wis. 2d 112, 115, 334 N.W.2d 580 (Ct. App. 1983). An appellate court as well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3088 - 2005-03-31
2008 WI APP 63
In Parks v. City of Madison, 171 Wis. 2d 730, 738, 492 N.W.2d 365 (Ct. App. 1992), we recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32110 - 2008-04-29
In Parks v. City of Madison, 171 Wis. 2d 730, 738, 492 N.W.2d 365 (Ct. App. 1992), we recognized
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32110 - 2008-04-29
[PDF]
Parke O'Flaherty, Ltd. v. Patricia M. Knuth
a particular legal standard is a question of law. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis. 2d 106, 112, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19
a particular legal standard is a question of law. Eastman v. City of Madison, 117 Wis. 2d 106, 112, 342
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5592 - 2017-09-19
State v. Vickie L. Shipler
of the statute. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis. 2d 18, 25 ¶12, 559 N.W.2d 563 (1997). If the statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
of the statute. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis. 2d 18, 25 ¶12, 559 N.W.2d 563 (1997). If the statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2747 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karla J.
.” Robinson, 145 Wis. 2d at 281-82 (quoting Pumorlo v. City of Merrill, 125 Wis. 102, 111, 103 N.W. 464
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20645 - 2017-09-21
.” Robinson, 145 Wis. 2d at 281-82 (quoting Pumorlo v. City of Merrill, 125 Wis. 102, 111, 103 N.W. 464
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20645 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a confidential police informant working with City of Racine police, telephoned Rodriguez from Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109567 - 2017-09-21
, a confidential police informant working with City of Racine police, telephoned Rodriguez from Racine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109567 - 2017-09-21
State v. Albert G. Holman
. ¶9 Kenneth Huber, an engineering technician with the City of Milwaukee, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
. ¶9 Kenneth Huber, an engineering technician with the City of Milwaukee, testified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16318 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that a hearing de novo is a new hearing.[2] In addition to Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
that a hearing de novo is a new hearing.[2] In addition to Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
Jacqueline M. Grosshans v. William J. Grosshans
of a child, and $5500 for city-mandated street repair. DISCUSSION ¶5 Grosshans first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
of a child, and $5500 for city-mandated street repair. DISCUSSION ¶5 Grosshans first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25803 - 2006-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
“independently, using the same methodology as the circuit court.” City of Prescott v. Holmgren, 2006 WI App 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27
“independently, using the same methodology as the circuit court.” City of Prescott v. Holmgren, 2006 WI App 172
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52619 - 2010-07-27