Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12151 - 12160 of 50086 for our.
Search results 12151 - 12160 of 50086 for our.
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
discretion of the circuit court, and our review is limited to determining whether the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20
discretion of the circuit court, and our review is limited to determining whether the court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
, and freely entered. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea questionnaires, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140363 - 2015-04-20
, and freely entered. Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the plea questionnaires, waiver
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140363 - 2015-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence, and will structure our own discussion in the same manner. ¶5 As to the second claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
of the evidence, and will structure our own discussion in the same manner. ¶5 As to the second claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information “set forth with specificity.” WIS. STAT. § 48.42(1). Our review of the records satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
information “set forth with specificity.” WIS. STAT. § 48.42(1). Our review of the records satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
include some procedural facts in our opinion that appear in the Village’s brief, but which are apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
include some procedural facts in our opinion that appear in the Village’s brief, but which are apparently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
have not used the phrase “abuse of discretion” since 1992, when our supreme court replaced the phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
have not used the phrase “abuse of discretion” since 1992, when our supreme court replaced the phrase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and that the evidence is sufficient to support the PRB’s decision. Based upon our No. 2023AP52 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
and that the evidence is sufficient to support the PRB’s decision. Based upon our No. 2023AP52 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801768 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Jacob T., our supreme court held that WIS. STAT. § 48.415(6) calls for fact finders to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67803 - 2014-09-15
. Jacob T., our supreme court held that WIS. STAT. § 48.415(6) calls for fact finders to consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67803 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Our independent review of the appellate record satisfies us that the no-merit report properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587118 - 2022-11-09
. Our independent review of the appellate record satisfies us that the no-merit report properly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=587118 - 2022-11-09
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756269 - 2024-01-31
merit. See State v. Bangert, 131 Wis. 2d 246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756269 - 2024-01-31