Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12161 - 12170 of 16505 for commentating.
Search results 12161 - 12170 of 16505 for commentating.
State v. Lamarcus D. Jones
was unable to stand, especially in light of the trial court’s comments to the jury about standing as a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7107 - 2005-03-31
was unable to stand, especially in light of the trial court’s comments to the jury about standing as a sign
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7107 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Williams
.” Id. at 300, 560 N.W.2d at 298. In Green, we compared the two statutes and commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
.” Id. at 300, 560 N.W.2d at 298. In Green, we compared the two statutes and commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11241 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the garage area, with a level of 22.30 dS/m. The report comments, “This soluble salts level would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283904 - 2020-09-02
the garage area, with a level of 22.30 dS/m. The report comments, “This soluble salts level would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=283904 - 2020-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the criteria for supervised release. We do not read the trial court’s comments as a credibility assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156112 - 2017-09-21
the criteria for supervised release. We do not read the trial court’s comments as a credibility assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Maloney
invited the State’s investigator, Kim Skorlinski, to comment on Maloney’s credibility. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6769 - 2017-09-20
invited the State’s investigator, Kim Skorlinski, to comment on Maloney’s credibility. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6769 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Id. at 613. No. 2011AP2864-CRAC(D) � � Based on these comments, I am convinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
. Id. at 613. No. 2011AP2864-CRAC(D) � � Based on these comments, I am convinced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81333 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Michael R.
to, or motivated by, involvement with a gang. It was not improper for the court to comment on the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9173 - 2017-09-19
to, or motivated by, involvement with a gang. It was not improper for the court to comment on the seriousness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9173 - 2017-09-19
Robert Meixelsperger v. Debbra L. Meixelsperger
of these statutory factors by commenting that: Given that presumption [of an equal property division], one might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
of these statutory factors by commenting that: Given that presumption [of an equal property division], one might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12816 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
; and the testimony of the officer at the jail that he overheard Trinka comment, “[D]ing dong pissed me off … so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
; and the testimony of the officer at the jail that he overheard Trinka comment, “[D]ing dong pissed me off … so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105728 - 2013-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with the seriousness of his crime nor why it is a relevant sentencing factor. The circuit court did comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591673 - 2022-11-22
with the seriousness of his crime nor why it is a relevant sentencing factor. The circuit court did comment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=591673 - 2022-11-22