Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 12161 - 12170 of 68393 for did.
Search results 12161 - 12170 of 68393 for did.
Lawrence McCoy v. David Schwarz
time on his forfeited time; (3) that DOC did not adequately consider alternatives to revocation; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18194 - 2005-05-18
time on his forfeited time; (3) that DOC did not adequately consider alternatives to revocation; (4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18194 - 2005-05-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 As the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191804 - 2017-09-21
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1 As the court did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191804 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to properly serve his notice of appeal on the Village and, therefore, the circuit court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147095 - 2015-08-25
to properly serve his notice of appeal on the Village and, therefore, the circuit court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147095 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
Jerome Selmer v. Madison Department of Public Health
in the proceedings. We agree. Selmer did not raise any question about the applicable standard in the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13095 - 2017-09-21
in the proceedings. We agree. Selmer did not raise any question about the applicable standard in the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13095 - 2017-09-21
State v. La'Shone Jackson
by things that Jackson told his attorneys shortly before the trial date. Although the trial court did say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2941 - 2005-03-31
by things that Jackson told his attorneys shortly before the trial date. Although the trial court did say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2941 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
it was not then in existence or because it was unknowingly overlooked by all the parties). We conclude that it did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92721 - 2014-09-15
it was not then in existence or because it was unknowingly overlooked by all the parties). We conclude that it did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92721 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that its 2012 property assessments did not reflect the market conditions. Accordingly, it filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109102 - 2014-03-18
that its 2012 property assessments did not reflect the market conditions. Accordingly, it filed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109102 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Link
McDowell a copy of the $12,040 check and did not mention the $6,000 check. They told McDowell that Konkel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9289 - 2017-09-19
McDowell a copy of the $12,040 check and did not mention the $6,000 check. They told McDowell that Konkel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9289 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Jimmy D. Bridges v. Jeffrey Endicott
decision. We conclude that the petition was properly dismissed because Bridges did not show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16325 - 2017-09-21
decision. We conclude that the petition was properly dismissed because Bridges did not show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16325 - 2017-09-21
Andrew J.N., Jr. v. Wendy L.D.
and Andrew did not present substantial evidence that it would be emotionally or physically harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8370 - 2005-03-31
and Andrew did not present substantial evidence that it would be emotionally or physically harmful
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8370 - 2005-03-31